Template talk:Research

Categories

So this template is equipped to replace Template:Researchminor, Template:Researchmoderate, and Template:Researchmajor. Those three templates each categorize to different categories; I can rig this template to categorize to three separate categories as well, if preferred (at the moment, they all categorize to Category:Research needed). I wanted to get input before I did that. My question is, do we need three categories? Or would we prefer to lump them together? Also, if this template is adequate, those other three templates can be deleted by someone with sufficient userrights. Embyr 75 (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2015 (CST)

IMO having three templates for it is a good idea. --Parax0 (talk) 20:14, 29 January 2015 (CST)

Derp, I just realized that you said you'd rather have three templates; for some reason when I read this my brain processed it as three categories and I never gave it a second thought. Would you like me to go back and re-implement the first three templates? (I just replaced them all with this one.) ^_^; Embyr 75 (talk) 10:12, 14 March 2015 (CDT)

nah, we've been doing it this way for a month and a half now, don't see any reason to change it. I do like the "minor/moderate/major" syntax more than "1/2/3" though. --Parax0 (talk) 16:18, 14 March 2015 (CDT)